Plea at your own risk….

I do not practice criminal law, so I rarely even read the criminal law cases that come down from our appellate courts.  Despite that, the case of Conwill v. State of Mississippi, 2010-IA-0228SCT caught my eye this week.  The majority dismissed Conwill’s interlocutory appeal and Presiding Justice Dickinson joined by Chief Justice Waller, Justice Kitchens and Justice Chandler issued a sharp objection to the majority.  Take a look:

 

DAVID E. CONWILL

v.

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

 

DICKINSON, PRESIDING JUSTICE, OBJECTING TO THE ORDER WITH

SEPARATE WRITTEN STATEMENT:

¶1. David Conwill – who previously had received a ticket for driving under the influence

(“DUI”) – was arrested in Madison County and charged with possessing cocaine found in his

car. At a hearing, Conwill swore the drugs were not his; later the Madison County Sheriff’s

Department recorded a telephone call in which Conwill admitted the drugs were his.

¶2. The Madison County District Attorney sent Conwill’s attorney a letter, pointing out

the recorded admission, and offering a deal for Conwill to plead guilty to both the cocaine

charge and the DUI. Conwill did plead guilty and was sentenced to five years, with four

years suspended and one year to serve.

¶3. After Conwill began serving his sentence, the Madison County District Attorney

returned to the Madison County grand jury and obtained an indictment against Conwill for

perjury, related to Conwill’s initial denial that the cocaine was his. Because Conwill had

pleaded guilty on the cocaine and felony DUI charges, the perjury indictment charged

Conwill as a habitual offender.

¶4. Conwill filed a motion to dismiss the indictment, claiming in essence that his

negotiations with the district attorney, and his guilty plea, prohibited a prosecution for

perjury, because the false statement was made in connection with the cocaine charge to

which the district attorney negotiated a plea. The trial judge denied the motion to dismiss,

and Conwill filed an application for an interlocutory appeal, which we initially granted.

Because, for reasons I am unable to comprehend, the Court now dismisses the interlocutory

appeal, I respectfully dissent.

¶5. When the district attorney negotiated the plea, he knew all the facts and circumstances

that led to the later perjury prosecution, and those facts and circumstances arose out of the

same case. By persuading Conwill to plead guilty – which required him to swear in court

that he was guilty – the district attorney assured himself of a perjury conviction, since

Conwill’s two sworn statements contradicted each other.

¶6. The Court’s decision today raises serious questions about fairness and due process;

and it stands as a dangerous precedent. I would order the indictment dismissed.

WALLER, C.J., KITCHENS AND CHANDLER, JJ., JOIN THIS SEPARATE

WRITTEN STATEMENT.

So you offer a guy a plea deal which causes him to testify in conflict with what he has previously testified.  He is sentenced on the plea and then you charge him with perjury?  My dad was a career law enforcement officer, and I suspect even he would have a problem with this.  The prosecutor has to be thinking “gotcha sucker.”   

It would appear for the time being that the prudent course of action in future cases is to make dang sure all plea agreements incorporate potential perjury charges.  Dismissing the interlocutory appeals means that Conwill is headed back for a trial.  Once that trial in completed, look for this case to end back up before the MSSC.

Advertisements

About randywallace
I am a husband, father, attorney, outdoorsman and cook.

2 Responses to Plea at your own risk….

  1. Anderson says:

    Yes, that was egregious — glad you’re blogging this. What struck me was that King voted to dismiss the appeal; had Graves been on the court, Connell would’ve likely won 5-4. Pretty sorry case for King to demonstrate his conservative cred on.

  2. Areopagus says:

    The most unkindest cut of all: with this third charge (perjury), Conwill can now be classified as an habitual offender. With a mandatory sentence imposed.

    Something really stinks here…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: